OFFICE HOURS: TUES AND THURS 11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Course Description:
Students in our department often ask what the difference is between analytic and continental philosophy. This course is designed in part as a response to that question. It surveys the development of one side of the alleged distinction, the analytic tradition, as one line of response to the transcendental idealism of the 18th century author Immanuel Kant. Beginning (for those who are not familiar with the work of Kant) with a discussion of Kant’s philosophical contributions, the course follows the trail of one kind of reaction to Kant’s so-called Copernican Revolution in Epistemology—the kind of reaction that understands the meaning of the experience and knowledge that Kant describes in terms of logic and language. The topics that come to concern the analysts, as we will discover, extend beyond the meanings of mere propositions, to such larger issues as what we mean when we say that something causes something else, what we could possibly intend when we say that something is a law of nature, and what we can legitimately be said to know about any of this stuff.
Clarity is possibly the highest value in the analytic tradition. Hence, the writing activities assigned for this course will focus on gaining and exhibiting clarity in our thought. Grades for this course will therefore be determined by 4 explications, a kind of argument presentation that focuses solely on saying clearly what one understands (a description of this kind of writing is attached), a take-home exam that is really more like a paper, and a final paper, 6-10 pages in length, to be presented at a class conference at the end of the term. Course grades will be determined on the following basis:
Explications (average) 30%
Midterm paper/exam 30%
Final presentation 30%
Participation 10%
I do not take attendance, and will not be responsible for keeping you in class. However, I do offer a 10% participation grade as a fudge factor in the event that a student needs a bit of help making a particular grade—I can in good conscience, and will, boost a semester grade on the basis of conscientious attendance and participation. It is your decision whether you want to take advantage of the free points that are available through this means.
Copy Packet for Phil 3032—Available in the Bookstore under that name
(page numbers listed in assignments correspond to bookstore pagination)
The Philosophy of Language, 4th ed., A. P. Martinich (designated below as PL)
Aug 21 Introduction
Aug 23 Kant--copy
packet pp. 1-8
Aug 28 Kant—copy
packet pp. 9-17
Aug 30 Frege, “On Sense and
Nominatum”, PL pp. 199-211
Sept 4 Russell,
“On Denoting”, PL pp. 212-220
Sept 6 Russell,
“Descriptions”, PL pp. 221-227
Explication #1 Due
Sept 11 Strawson, “On
Referring”, PL pp. 228-242
Sept 13 Russell, “Mr. Strawson
on Referring”, PL pp. 243-246
Sept 18 Ayer, “The A Priori”,
copy packet pp. 19-27
Sept 20 Kripke, “Metaphysical
Necessity”, copy packet pp. 29-34
Sept 25 Hempel, “Empiricist
Criteria of Cognitive Significance:
Problems
and Changes”, PL pp. 34-46
Oct 2 finish
Quine and/or catch up --NO NEW READING
Explication
#2 Due
Oct 4 Tarski,
“The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of
Semantics”,
PL pp. 69-91
Oct 9 Finish Tarski—NO NEW READING
PHIL 3032 SYLLABUS
P. 3
Oct 11 Wittgenstein,
copy packet pp. 36-37
Oct 16 Wittgenstein,
copy packet pp. 38-40
Oct 18 Wittgenstein, copy packet pp. 41-43
HAND OUT MIDTERM QUESTIONS
Oct 23 Cook,
“Wittgenstein on Privacy” PL pp. 514-530
Oct 25 Kripke,
“On Rules and Private Language”, PL pp. 531-544
MIDTERM RESPONSES DUE
Oct 30 Grice, “Meaning”, PL
pp. 92-97
Nov 1 Davidson,
“Truth and Meaning”, PL pp. 98-109
Nov 6 Russell,
“On Induction”, copy packet pp. 44-47
Explication #3 Due
Nov 8 Russell,
“On the Notion of Cause, copy packet pp. 49-56
Nov 13 Ducasse, “On the Nature of Observability of
the Causal Relation”
Copy packet
pp. 56-62
Nov 15 Collingwood,
“On the So-Called Idea of Causation”, copy packet
pp. 62-88
Nov 20 Ayer, “What
is a Law of Nature?”, copy packet pp. 73-81
Nov 22 finish Ayer—NO NEW READING
Explication #4 Due
Nov 27 Chisholm,
“Knowledge and True Opinion”, copy packet pp. 31-92
Nov 29 Amico,
“Roderick Chisholm and the Problem of the Criterion”,
copy packet pp. 93-98
Dec 4 Catch
up and Review
Dec 6 STUDENT CONFERENCE
Dec 11 or 13 STUDENT CONFERENCE