| First Annual Review |
| Second Annual Review |
| Third Annual Review |
In the fall of 1994, Brent Wilson formed a committee to submit a grant proposal to USWest. A hard copy is included in my paper-based portfolio. Our team consisted of Brent Wilson, Jeff Wein, myself, and four teachers who represented different participating school districts. This was my first experience in grant-writing, and needless to say, it was not accepted. However, the idea was good: it had
The idea of the Rocky Mountain Lesson Exchange lived on, and in June of 1995, Brent, Jeff, and I presented a prototype of the system at the TIE (Technology in Education) conference in Steamboat Springs, where it was warmly received.
I have continued to work on a spin-off of the original proposal. It is called K-12 Connections, and is found under the Research section of the School of Education Home Page.
In the spring of 1996, part of my job at RMC Research Corporation was to write a funding proposal. Our CEO (Shelley Billig) gave the project full corporate support, since this was a major funding proposal for $5 million over five years. She told me "it looks like a winner" once it was finished, though we realized the competition was very stiff for field-initiated grants.
I wrote the research proposal, and Dianna Lawyer-Brook wrote the timeline, meeting notes, setting and some of the appendices. Our office manager wrote the budget. Jim Kettering, who was familiar with the Navajo Learning Network, sat in on a few meetings as we fleshed out the research design, but contrary to the authoring statement, he did not contribute any written material to this proposal. And unfortunately, he left the corporation soon afterwards, which most likely led to the proposal's not being accepted.
Some of the other staff at RMC recognized the value of this proposal and the evaluation model included in it. Later on, I fleshed out the model and submitted it as a research proposal for Phase II of the BVIP, where it was incorporated and used. Subsequently, a further expanded model based on this proposal was incorporated into the Texas Star Center modules, where it has recently been funded.
The original online version of the document is in the corporate file at RMC Research. A hard copy is included in my portfolio. An online copy can be found at Navajo Learning Network. It contains all the necessary information, minus confidential corporate budget data.
In June 1996, I received an e-mail message from Dr. Esko Johnson at
Kokkala Institute of Technology, Finland, inviting me to participate in a
videoconference to be held in Finland on October 12, 1996. Dr. Johnson
has invited several noted experts in distance learning to be part of this
conference, to be held via satellite.
I immediately contacted three distance learning experts here in Denver:
Clark Nelson from DPS (also in the ILT program), Ellen Waterman (adjunct
faculty at UCD and graduate of the ILT program), and Dianna Lawyer-Brook
(director of The French Connection, a distance learning program
connecting a rural school in Kansas with a suburban school in Paris).
All three agreed to participate, provided we could get funding for the
studio and the satellite uplink from our end. I submitted abstracts and
biographies of each of these experts to Dr. Johnson, who replied that he
would try to seek some funding from his end, and requested I write a
proposal.
When I mentioned this to Ed Nuhfer at UCD in July, he suggested that he
might be able to match some funds, and asked me to write him a proposal
as well. Both Esko Johnson and Ed Nuhfer accepted the proposal, which is
online at Videoconference with Finland.
With funding from both the Finns and UCD, we fully expected that the
videoconference would become a reality, and we set about developing our
agenda and presentations. Unfortunately, on September 19th, we received
a message from Muriel Woods at the Auraria Media Center that the the
scheduling problem was insurmountable. The studio and the support
staff would not be available at such an early hour on a weekend morning,
so we had to cancel the videoconference at the 11th hour. I passed on
Muriel's note to the Finns and to my team, and I hope that next time we
will meet with more success.
After the Creating Connections Annenberg/CPB Initiative II evaluation was
accepted by the project director, I was asked by my supervisor to write a
proposal for a short follow-up
study. We realized that since all data were gathered via e-mail by
NWREL, and since the response rate was very low, we needed to have some idea
about the types of barriers encountered by the nonrespondents to the
evaluation survey.
Since the BVIP contract was already underfunded and the deadline was well
past, this proposal was not accepted.
Lorraine Sherry, David Hoffman, Shelley Billig, and Joseph Martinez
Shelley Billig and the Technology Team
Videoconference: UCD and OPTEK, Finland
Lorraine Sherry
University of Colorado at Denver
A funding proposal submitted to Ed Nuhfer (UCD) and Esko Johnson
(Finland), August 24, 1996
Annenberg Follow-Up
Lorraine Sherry
RMC Research Corporation
A funding proposal submitted to Libby Black on September 16, 1996
RMC Research Corporation
A funding proposal submitted to Caddo Parish, Louisiana, April 25, 1997
RMC Research Corporation
A funding proposal submitted to The WEB Project, Montpelier, VT.,
February 24,
1997
File moved November 7, 1997