Factorial ANOVA
Factorial ANOVA is used to answer questions like this:
Are there any main effects or interactions between three independent
variables - SES, ethnicity, and method - and job satisfaction?
A second factor is added to a one-way ANOVA design to increase power. We
do not use covariates here. We may wish to explore interactions though.
Key points:
- Factorial ANOVA means you have 2 or more independent variables.
- Factorial ANOVA increases the power by adding another factor.
- Factorial ANOVA shows interactions between independent variables.
- It is very important to keep n the same in all the cells: this
guarantees orthogonality.
- You cannot do a factorial ANOVA with less than 2 people per cell.
- A fully crossed design has all cells filled, e.g. 2 x 3 = 6 cells.
General Linear Model
- For a 1-way ANOVA (one independent variable), the general linear
model is
Xij = mu + group effect (alpha j or MSb) + error (eij or MSw)
- For a 2-way ANOVA on the same results (two independent variables),
the general linear model becomes
Xijk = mu + group effect #1 (alpha j) + group effect #2 (beta
k) + interaction term + error (eijk)
- Note that the eijk error term is much smaller than the eij error term.
- This is because eij breaks up into group effect #2 + interaction +
this much smaller error.
- Since the error goes down, the power goes up.
Hypotheses
- You increase the number of hypotheses: instead of Hzero = no
significant difference between experimental and control, you add
another factor like gender, and you get:
- Hzero: mu experimental = mu control
- Hzero: mu male = mu female
- Hzero: there is no interaction between method and gender.
- There is an F ratio for each of these null hypotheses.
- If you have 3 factors, then you get three main effects, three 2-way
interctions, and one 3-way interaction - all with null hypotheses.
Interactions
- To find out if there is an interaction, graph the cell means, using
one of the IVs on the x-axis and the DV on the y-axis. Use the other IV
for a parameter (say one line for males, one line for females).
- If the
lines are parallel, there is no interaction. (i.e. same slope, and we
don't care about the separation).
- The separation simply says that there is a constant difference between
the lines, e.g., experimental works better than control regardless of gender.
- Lack of interaction does increase the generalizability of the
treatment design.
Variance
- You can tell how much of the variance in the scores is due to each
factor.
- Look at the SS column and convert it to a percentage.
- In a 3-way ANOVA, variance is accounted for by all three factors.
Three-way designs
- Adding another factor increases power.
- Adding another factors increases complexity and problems in
interpreting the results.
- Every single F is divided by the same MSe.
- To find the 2-way interactions, you need to draw three graphs,
averaging over the factor that you are *not* including:
- One for method x gender (gender on x-axis, method as parameter)
- One for method x SES (SES on x-axis, method as parameter)
- One for gender x SES (SES on x-axis, gender as parameter)
- If the 3 graphs look alike, then there is no interaction.
- If they don't, then you need to explore the possibility of interaction.
- To find the 3-way interaction, you need to split on one IV and draw
two graphs - here, you do not average anything - use the cell means:
- One for experimental method (SES on x-axis, gender as parameter)
- One for control group (SES on x-axis, gender as parameter)
- If these look alike, there is no interaction (i.e. you can overlay them)
Degrees of Freedom
- The group df goes across the top of the table; the dfw down the side.
- Main effect: df = J-1 (i.e., one less than the number of groups, for
each factor) - just like in a 1-way ANOVA.
- Interaction: df = (j-1)*(k-1)
- Error term: dfw = N - jk (N is total number of subjects, jk is the
product of the number of groups, say 2x2=4) - recall, for a 1-way ANOVA
it used to be N - j.
Back to Statistics course
Lorraine Sherry
lsherry@carbon.cudenver.edu
Created November 3, 1996